One of the most interesting developments in corporate finance is the increased appreciation of Asset-Based Lending (ABL) as an effective, often less expensive option for financing asset heavy businesses with seasonal or cyclical cash flow. These are not your parents' ABLs. They are well-collateralized, competitively priced vehicles to finance large, successful companies. Yet decades-old misconceptions still cloud the understanding of ABL and – worse yet – may still keep some companies from considering a loan instrument that could be their most effective option for financing.
Why do those misconceptions still exist? ABLs earned their reputation decades ago, when they were seen as creative financing for troubled companies that didn’t have the cash flow to support traditional loans. “They’d say, okay, now we have to just mortgage everything we have to try to get a loan to pay down our current debt and keep the company going,” explains Matt Downs, a senior vice president for specialty lending at U.S. Bank. “They didn’t want to go back to the country club and say they just got an ABL loan, because everyone would look at them like they were about to file bankruptcy.”
Back then, most ABL deals were viewed as survival loans for “mom and pop” businesses. But Downs says relationship and investment banks started using the ABL structure for larger deals decades ago, which completely changed the perception of the industry.
“That created a whole syndicated loan market for ABL deals. You can make a very large loan to a steel company that’s backed by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and maybe some of their real estate,” he explains. “You can sell-off loan participations to other like-minded asset-based lenders to spread the risk. It’s all about debt capacity. The question is how much debt can you support, and some very successful companies can support more debt with asset-based financing.”
How ABL has changed
Traditional loans are based on cash flow or multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization). But ABL uses a different formula. As the name would suggest, asset-based financing is based on the value of the company’s assets, which become the loan’s collateral. As a result, a successful widget distributor with large inventory but low margins might have a much higher debt capacity with ABL.
“If you're trying to finance on a cash flow basis as a multiple of your cash flow or multiple of EBITDA, you might not generate very much.” Downs says. “But if you did it as a percentage of your actual inventory, because you carry a ton of inventory in a big warehouse as a distributor, you’re going to be able to generate a much larger number with an asset-based loan.”
As a result, an increasing number of large, successful businesses have discovered the merits of asset-based financing.
“That’s where ABL has gone, especially on the large corporate side,” he says. “It’s just another method of financing a company that maybe could generate more debt capacity in a different way.”
Still, despite its increased popularity, some of the concerns about ABLs continue to persist. So, changing that perception may require some ABL myth busting.