The trend of environmental, social and governance (or ESG) investing and its outcome-driven cousin, impact investing, has grown rapidly among individual investors in recent years.
More than two-thirds of investors (67%) believe they have a responsibility to invest in companies that make the world a better place, while more than half (51%) say they avoid investing in companies that don’t align with their values, according to a survey conducted by MagnifyMoney.
Investment providers have followed suit. More than $51 billion was invested in funds that employ ESG criteria in 2020, which was more than twice as much as the year before, according to Morningstar. In our current social and political environment, interest in impact investing remains high.
Institutional investing and ESG strategy
ESG investing within the institutional realm is increasing, too. About one-third of institutional investors in the U.S. are implementing ESG, according to the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment.1
Institutional investors cited a wide range of motivations for implementing ESG criteria, including:
- 57% To align investment strategies with organizational values
- 35% To influence corporate behavior
- 34% To minimize headline risk
- 29% To generate higher risk-adjusted returns over the long term
- 26% To make a better world
- 23% To enhance downside protection
- 17% To benefit from new sources of diversification
Going beyond ESG to DEI
Lisa Isaacson, managing director, strategic initiatives for U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Bank, observed a change in client requests about ESG investing after the summer of 2020.
“Our clients started asking about impact investing more specifically than just environmental, social and governance,” she says. “They were interested in investing according to diversity, equity and inclusion [DEI] criteria as well. We saw that 2020 was a flash point for investors to think differently about whether their investments are helping make a better world.”
Isaacson lists social equity and social justice as two of the main impact themes that investors are focusing on. “We’re also getting more questions from U.S. investors now about carbon and climate change,” she says.
According to Breda Sullivan, head of Depositary, Custody and Banking for U.S. Bank Investment Services – Europe, interest in ESG investing among institutional investors is being driven by two main things.
“The first is a desire among these investors to work with asset managers who will invest money in support of their values,” she says. “And the second is the regulatory developments in Europe, which give investing in accordance with ESG principals further impetus.”
James Byron, vice president of middle office product management at U.S. Bank Wealth Management and Investment Services, says Europe has pushed ahead of the U.S. when it comes to ESG regulation with the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). This imposes comprehensive sustainability disclosure requirements on asset managers and other financial market participants in the EU covering a broad range of ESG metrics.
“One of our European clients needed to comply with Article 8 under the SFDR, and we were able to provide them with the necessary reporting to meet these requirements,” says Byron. “In the U.S., institutional clients are asking us for reporting help to demonstrate their ESG ratings on a portfolio level, instead of line-by-line.”
Byron notes that from an institutional investor’s standpoint, these investors want to work with fund managers who they’re confident aren’t investing in companies that don’t meet their ESG criteria.
“They have choices about which fund managers they use, and ESG compliance is going to play a big role in these choices going forward,” he says. “It will help attract more investors who want fund managers to focus on ESG criteria.”
ESG best practices for institutional investors
Isaacson urges investors looking to integrate ESG to ask questions about a provider’s available strategies and choose one that is supportive of their ultimate investment goals. She also suggests that institutional investors who want to engage in impact investing for a particular outcome should make sure they understand whether data exists to support their objective.